Model I : The Warren Commision Version.

Its clearest exposition was given by Theresa Seay. There are two components to the Warren Commision version: The Tale of the 3 Bullets , and The Lone Nut Theory.

The Magic Bullet Theory

According to the Tale of the 3 Bullets , 3 bullets , and only 3 were fired, and they all came from Lee Harvey Oswald's gun. One of these bullets is known as "The Magic Bullet". Its hypothetical trajectory is:

  1. Entered JFK's neck from the back / Came out of his throat.

  2. Hit Kennedy in the head. Entered Connolly's back / Came out of his chest.

  3. Entered Connolly's wrist/ Came out of his wrist and disappeared. Hit a bystander , James Tague. This bullet reappeared "mysteriously" on a child's stretcher in Parkland Hospital. After making 7 wounds the CE 399 bullet was virtually unscratched with no loss of metal.

The 2nd bullet is called the "head shot". This is the bullet that , almost instantaneously, killed Kennedy; both official and unofficial versions concur on this point. The government contends, however, that the bullet entered from the back of the head and came out the front. One of the problems with the government theory is that their version of where the bullet struck keeps moving about the skull. Statements by doctors, generals and politicians over the years have placed this bullet as far down as the hairline at the back of the neck, and as far up as the crown of the head; photographs , also, have appeared and disappeared at different times to substantiate these claims.

The 3rd shot, in both official and unofficial versions, was a misfire that wounded James Tague.

The Lone Nut Theory

  1. Oswald was the assassin.

  2. He acted alone, shooting all the bullets from the window at the far right of the 6th floor of the Texas Book Depository.

  3. His motives were either:

    1. Fundamental craziness, ( or, as the inventor of punitive psychiatry in Russia, Shnevhnesky, might call it :"creeping schizophrenia". )

    2. Anger because he was a dedicated Communist, working for the KGB, and the Kennedy administration had made 13 attempts to assassinate Castro.

    3. Anger because he was a fanatical anti-Communist, and Kennedy had botched the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba.

Motives (ii) and (iii) sit quite well together in the government accounts. Attempts are rarely made to reconcile them.( In fact it came out several times during the conference, that the stark contradictions in these "motives" indicate a high degree of in-fighting at the level of the intelligence agencies and associated right-wing groups: should Oswald be painted as a KGB agent, thereby risking a call for war with the Soviet Union; or sold to the public as a lone nut to draw attention away from the true architects of the assassination, his employers in the CIA, DIA etc.? )

Jack Ruby, the government contends, was also a victim of "creeping schizophrenia". Ruby is pictured as an irate taxpayer who went bonkers from the knowledge that somebody murdered his president, then got himself a gun and killed the bastard.

This , with minor variations, ( such as the wanderings of the head, throat and back wounds to accomodate the critics ), is the official version of the Warren Commision. It is the same one that was maintained, with important reservations, by the House Select Committee of Assassinations's report of 1979, and it is the view promulgated this very week, 30 years later, by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, Time, Life, Newsweek, the major dailies and every other mainstream media medium.


The consensus opinion of the Research Community differs from the report of the Warren Commission in all major respects. A stranger to this planet, listening to the two accounts, would believe that he was being informed of completely distinct events.

The consensus opinion maintains that at least 5 bullets were fired that afternoon in Dealey Plaza . (Robert Groden in his two hour presentation analyzed the Zapruder film, frame-by-frame, to show the evidence that 7 bullets had been fired. ) I refer once again to the Theresa Seay for the 'minimal ' picture:

The Five Shots

  1. The first shot was a small bullet that entered Kennedy's throat from the front. The official autopsy photograph of this wound show an enormous gash on the throat which, the government claims, was put there by a doctor doing an emergency tracheotomy. Doctors not directly involved have claimed that the wound is 10 times the size of a standard tracheotomy incision, and there is speculation that it was made to excise this bullet and get rid of it. It would provide irrefutable evidence of a gunman at the front of the motorcade.

  2. The second shot entered Kennedy's back, fairly low down; there is no way it could have exited from the throat. This bullet has never been dissected.

  3. The third shot hit governor Connolly in the back. The 5th rib on the left was shattered. It then went through his wrist and lodged itself in his right thigh. ( Robert Groden disagrees on this point and argues that Connolly was hit by 3 bullets, one for each location.)

  4. This is the bullet that hit James Tague.

  5. The crucial fifth shot hit JFK in the head. It could only have come from the front. The Zapruder film shows clearly that the front of the head was blown away.

The atmosphere of the macabre peaked in intensity on Saturday afternoon, as we gazed at this utterly hideous frame in the Zapruder film, which shows the blood, brains and skull flaps bursting from Kennedy's head and covering the field of vision. Using a laser pointer Bob Groden moved our attention from place to place :"You see - this shows that - and over here we see that....." .

Most of the medical personell at Parkland Hospital who saw the body when it was brought in have testified that this bullet exited from the back of the head, leaving a small wound that is clearly visible even in the autopsy photographs. They do not base their opinions on these photographs however, which have clearly been tampered with it every imaginable way.

The Oswald File

The evidence presented convinced most of us that Oswald was not the lone assassin. It was also very persuasive, if not definitive, in proving that Oswald did not fire any of the guns used in the assassination. At the same time Oswald was an extremely shady and sinister figure, an operative in the Intelligence community, in fact a rather important one. We now know that he had done work at various times for the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Department of Army Intelligence, the CIA, the FBI, and that he had connections with the Mafia - ( standard for spooks) .

The picture of his relations to the KGB is still extremely murky. His "defection" to Russia in 1959 was almost certainly a espionage gambit orchestrated by American intelligence agencies. What is still very unclear are the reasons why the Russians allowed him to stay. His request for asylum in the U.S.S.R. was granted at the highest level, by Mikoyan and Khrushchev . Some evidence was presented to suggest that his mission involved sensitive negociations between the Russian and the American agencies, so that he functioned as a middleman. There was even some speculation that he may have told the Russians enough to shoot down and capture Gary Powers in the U-2 incident of May, 1961.

The argument for this goes as follows: Both the CIA and the KGB had a stake in keeping the Cold War alive. They were thus natural allies in schemes designed to sabotage detente or any form of rapprochement between Kennedy and Khrushchev. The U-2 incident was serious enough to rupture any negociations, however cautious, that may have been going on at the time. It is known that Oswald was stationed for a while at the U-2 base in Atsugi, Japan and that he was privy to classified information. Gary Powers himself accused Oswald of betraying him.

If Lee Harvey Oswald was so intimately connected with espionage, and if these same agencies are being fingered today as its architects , it is almost impossible to believe that Oswald was completely clean with respect to the planning and preparations for the Kennedy assassination. The Garrison model, which makes Oswald out to be a 'patsy', 'sheep-dipped' by the CIA as a scapegoat , was not endorsed by everyone. The disturbing truth is, that Oswald was so sinister in his own right, that one has no difficulty at all in seeing him as a candidate for one of the assassins. One must turn to the large amount of circumstantial evidence available to conclude that he did not actually pull the trigger.

As to the motives for the assassination, the consensus opinion of the Research Community, as expressed at this conference, is:

  1. The CIA was angry because it had failed to force Kennedy's hand to launch an invasion of Cuba with American combat troops, in the style of Reagan's Grenada venture or Bush's Panama atrocity.

  2. It was also incensed because part of the deal with Khrushchev, b y which he agreed to pull Russian missiles out of Cuba, was that the Americans would shut down the secret CIA/ anti-Castro Cuban exile military bases from which raids doing extensive damage to Cuba were being launched. After the CIA ignored Kennedy's express instructions to do so, he appears to have enlisted the resources of the Army and Navy to shut them down.

  3. Starting in 1961, The Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the various agencies of military intelligence had tried to trick Kennedy into committing American ground troops to Vietnam. They did this by giving him false information about the military successes of the Viet Cong. Up to the day before his death, when he drafted memorandum NAMS- 263 JFK adamantly refused to commit the United States to a ground war. Evidence was presented to show that secret mobilization plans for a major war involving thousands of fatalities were put into operation a few days after Kennedy's death.

  4. The Mafia had strong reasons to hate both of the Kennedys. In addition to 'allowing' Castro to keep control over Cuba, they had launched the strongest campaign against the Mob since its origins in the 30's.

It is unfortunate that at the same time that JFK was attacking the CIA and RFK was attacking the Mafia, these two groups were forging alliances and combining resources to work together in areas that were of mutual interest to them: gun-running, drug smuggling, overthrowing Castro, controlling South America. The first collaborations of the CIA and the MOB appear to have been in connection with the overthrow of the Arbenz government in Guatemala in 1954.

There was also a consensus in the Research Community over at least 3 people believed to be the persons most directly involved in setting up and carrying out the assassination:

  1. Charles Willoughby. Born in Heidelberg in 1892, he was the director of intelligence operations in the Pacific under General MacArthur from 1941 to 1951. He had extensive connections all over the world, but particularly in Germany, Italy and the United States, with neo-Nazi and violent extreme right groups.

  2. Carlo Marcello: Mafia kingpin for the New Orleans area. Marcello was involved in the recruting for the Arbenz operation. He also worked with Ferrie, Oswald, Bannister and Shaw, persons implicated by Jim Garrison in the assassination plot. On November 22, 1963, he was sitting in a courthouse on trial for Mob activities. With a guilty verdict he might have been deported. The news of the assassination disrupted the court proceedings. When it re-convened later that afternoon he was acquitted of all charges . This does not prove anything, but it is one more item in a considerable body of evidence pointing to him.

  3. H.L. Hunt and his family; A wealthy oilman involved in a wide range of right-wing extremist groups, it is believed that he was involved in paying off the right people in Dallas and in eradicating , through violence and even death ( including Ruby's murder of Oswald ) any evidence pointing away from Oswald.

This, as I have said, was the consensus opinion. Other suggested factors were : the role of LBJ ; persons in or around Washington with fascist convictions or connections, such as the right-wing fanatic lawyer Robert Morris ; J. Edgar Hoover, certainly implicated in the destruction of important evidence; the vindictive Allen Dulles, smarting from the humiliation of being cashiered by JFK after the Bay of Pigs ; certain generals angry with JFK for one reason or another and threatened to kill him; other mobsters such as Hoffa, Trafficante, Giancana; an OAS mercenary from Algeria named de Soutre ; and a certain Baron George de Mohrenschildt, a very mysterious figure with links to the CIA and the KGB, who was probably involved in setting Oswald up for the fall guy.

Conclusion


Return to

Home Page